The 2011 Census highlighted the substantial inequalities in health by: gender, ethnicity, socio-economic position, and area. Our general health is important to our sense of wellbeing and quality of life. But is it also an important indicator of whether we will need future medical or social care, or how long we will be able to work.
Very good health highest in London
Health and activity limitation by Local Authority, England and Wales, 2001 and 2011
Source: 2011 Census Analysis, ONS
Download the data
Around four-fifths (81.2%, 45.5 million) of the population were in good or very good general health in 2011. The proportion was higher in England (81.4%) than it was in Wales (77.8%).
People living in London reported better general health than any other region in England and Wales; more than half (50.5%) rated their health as very good. This is likely due to the younger age structure of the London population compared to other regions of England or Wales. By contrast, people in the North East tended to report the poorest general health with only 44% rating their health as very good and 7.4% rating their health as bad or very bad.
Gypsy or Irish Travellers were in the poorest health
People in “Not Good” health by ethnicity, England and Wales, 2011
Across different ethnic groups, there was a mixed picture of general health that may reflect different age structures, different social conditions or cultural expectations. The poorest health was reported by Gypsy or Irish Travellers, with close to a third (29.8%) in ‘Not Good’ health. In contrast, only around 1 in 12 (8.4%) Black Africans reported ‘Not Good’ health.
For these analyses, people in ‘Not Good’ health refer to those who rated their general health as either fair, bad or very bad, whilst ‘Good’ health refers to people who rated their general health as either very good or good.
People in routine occupations more than twice as likely to report ‘Not Good’ health
People in “Not Good” health by sex and selected socio-economic class, England and Wales, 2011
Poorer general health was associated with worse socio-economic outcomes. People working in routine occupations1 were more than twice as likely to report ‘Not Good’ health than people working in higher managerial and professional occupations2 for both males (30.5% compared with 13.7%) and females (33.8% compared with 14.1%).
People living in overcrowded houses were in worse health
People in “Not Good” health by age group and overcrowded household type, England and Wales, 2011
Looking at different age groups, young people, aged less than 16, in overcrowded households were more than twice as likely as their counterparts in under-occupied households to report ‘Not Good’ health (4.0% compared with 1.6% respectively). For those aged 65 and over, 62.0% of those living in overcrowded households reported ‘Not Good’ health, compared with 42.5% in under-occupied households3.
Stark difference in health between least and most deprived areas Health gap
The difference in health between the most and least deprived areas is present across all age groups but becomes particularly notable from age 30-34. By ages 60-64 for men and 55-59 for women, there was a 36% gap in the percentages of ‘Not Good’ health across areas.
How long do people live in ‘Good’ health?
Healthy life expectancy by NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and sex, England, 2010-12
Source: 2011 Census Analysis, ONS
Download the data.
Healthy life expectancy (HLE) indicates how long a person can expect to live in ‘Good’ health. Males born in England and Wales in 2011 could, on average, expect to live for slightly more than 79 years and spend 63.5 of those years in ‘Good’ health. Females born in England and Wales in 2011, however, could expect to live longer to an average age of 83 years, spending almost 65 of those years in ‘Good’ health.
This means that although females born in 2011 were estimated to have a longer life and more life years in ‘Good’ health, males could expect to spend a greater proportion of their lives in ‘Good’ health (80.2% compared with 78.0% for females).
There was a clear North-South divide in health expectancies. People living in areas in the South of England had HLEs above the national average, while the lowest HLEs were in areas with greater.